This bulletin is intended to provide
Tennessee state-chartered banks with guidance regarding the
interpretation of Tennessee Code Annotated (T.C.A.) Section 45-2-1102 and
related legal lending limit issues and in so doing supersedes Tennessee
Department of Financial Institutions Bulletin B-97-5 which clarified the
Department’s position regarding dates on which a bank must calculate its
legal lending limit for the next quarter.
The legal lending limit is a safety and
soundness measure intended to prevent one person or a relatively small and
economically related group of persons from borrowing an unduly large
amount of a bank’s funds. It is also intended to safeguard a bank’s
depositors by diversifying the risk of loan losses among a relatively
large number of creditworthy borrowers engaged in various types of
businesses.
As such, if in any instance it shall
appear, as determined by the Commissioner, that the interests of a group
composed of individuals, partners, unincorporated associations,
corporations, limited liability corporations, limited liability
partnerships, trusts or joint-ventures are so interrelated that, from a
credit standpoint, applying standard and customary banking practices, they
should be considered a single unit for the purposes of extensions of
credit, the total indebtedness of these interrelated customers shall be
combined and treated as the indebtedness of a single customer in applying
the legal lending limit.
Therefore, a loan or extension of
credit to one person shall be considered a loan or extension of credit to
a second person if the credit worthiness of the one person does not
justify the loan or extension of credit without reliance on the credit
worthiness of the second person.
Factors which may be relevant in
determining whether a loan or extension of credit to one person can be
justified without reliance on the credit-worthiness of a second person
include:
(a) Will the credit analysis
and documentation on file at the bank at the time the loan or extension of
credit was made substantiate that the one person has or will have the
financial capacity to generate sufficient funds from his or her own assets
and operations to repay the loan or extension of credit or is the source
of repayment the second person?
(b) Were the proceeds of the
loan or extension of credit to one person used for the primary benefit of
the one person or was a substantial portion of the proceeds used for the
benefit of the second person without a corresponding economic benefit to
the one person?
(c) Loans or extensions of
credit to a partnership, joint venture, or association are deemed to be
loans or extensions of credit to each member of the partnership, joint
venture, or association. This provision does not apply to limited
partners or to members of a joint venture or association if the partners
or members, by the terms of the partnership or membership agreement, are
not held generally liable for the debts or actions of the partnership,
joint venture, or association, and those provisions are valid under
applicable law.
Further, it is the policy of the
Department that loans signed in a secondary capacity are not normally
included in a person’s legal lending limit, however, loans guaranteed or
otherwise signed in a secondary capacity should be included in the lending
limit of an individual when one or both of the following factors are
present:
(a) The person signing in a
secondary capacity, rather than the maker, has the use and benefit of the
proceeds of the loan; and/ or
(b) The person signing in a
secondary capacity makes payments directly or indirectly on the loan.
If these factors are present, the note
guaranteed or otherwise covered should be included in the individual’s
lending limit along with any notes upon which he is primarily liable.
For the purposes of this policy,
secondary capacity means a person’s liability as a guarantor, surety, or
endorser as opposed to his or her direct liability as a maker or co-maker.
The Department
interprets the term “capital, surplus and undivided profits”(as used in
T.C.A. Section 45-2-1102(a)(1)) for purposes of calculating a bank’s legal
lending limit to be the same as the bank’s Tier One Capital as reported in
the bank’s most recent Consolidated Report of Condition and Income.
Therefore, unrealized gains and intangibles should not be included in the
bank’s “capital, surplus and undivided profits” for the purpose of
calculating the bank’s legal lending limit The Department’s
interpretation of T.C.A. §45-2-1102 continues to permit banks to calculate
their legal lending limit on a quarterly basis using Report of Condition
data. Accordingly, the calculation should be performed at the end of each
calendar quarter to determine the legal lending limit for the next
quarter. For purposes of this Bulletin, the effective date of each
calculation will be the earlier of the following dates: a) The date on
which the bank's Consolidated Report of Condition and Income (Call Report)
is submitted; or b) The date on which the bank's Call Report is required
to be submitted.
T.C.A. Section
45-2-1102(a)(2) provides that no loan limit shall be applicable to any
state-chartered bank in any situation or circumstance in which no loan
limit is imposed upon national banks. This exception applies only to
loans which a national bank may make without any loan limitation.
Therefore, if a less restrictive limitation is imposed upon a national
bank, a state-chartered bank may not rely upon T.C.A. Section
45-2-1102(a)(2) to use a loan limit that is less restrictive than
otherwise imposed by state law. However, in many circumstances a
state-chartered bank might rely upon T.C.A. Section 45-2-601, commonly
referred to as the wild-card statute, to use a less restrictive loan limit
than that imposed by T.C.A. Section 45-2-1102. The wild-card permits a
state-chartered bank to exercise any power or engage in any activity which
it could exercise or engage in if it were a national bank located in
Tennessee provided that the activity is consistent with the bank’s safe
and sound operation. Pursuant to 12 C.F.R. Section 32.1(c) there is no
loan limit for a national bank’s loan to its affiliates. Therefore, a
state-chartered bank can loan money to its affiliates (as that term is
defined in 12 U.S.C. Section 37c (b) (1)) without regard to the
limitations found at T.C.A. Section 45-2-1102. Even though there is no
legal lending limit for a national bank’s loans to its affiliates – these
loans would still be subject to the requirements of the Federal Reserve
Act’s Part 23A and 23B as well as the Federal Reserve Board’s Regulation
W. See 12 U.S.C. 371c, 371c-1 and 12 C.F.R. Section 223.
Generally, a
Tennessee chartered bank can only lend up to fifteen percent (15%) of its
Tier One Capital to any one borrower under T.C.A. Section 45-2-1102.
However, a Tennessee chartered bank can lend up to twenty-five percent
(25%) of its Tier One Capital to any one borrower with the prior written
approval of the board of directors or the finance committee. Under
certain circumstances, state-chartered banks have requested permission to
use the wild-card (T.C.A. Section 45-2-601) to calculate their legal
lending limit based upon their Tier One Capital, Tier Two Capital and the
ineligible portion of its Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses pursuant to
the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency’s definition of capital
contained in 12 C.F.R. Section 32.2(b). However, when using the
wild-card, a bank is also subject to all of the other restrictions imposed
upon a national bank. Pursuant to 12 C.F.R. Section 32.3(a) a national
bank’s legal lending limit is fifteen percent (15%) of its capital with an
additional ten percent (10%) available only if the additional ten percent
(10%) is secured by readily marketable security as defined by 12 C.F.R.
Section 32.2(n). Therefore, a state-chartered bank could only include
Tier Two Capital and the ineligible portion of its Allowance for Loan and
Lease Losses to determine its legal lending limit if it was willing to
abide by the fifteen percent (15%) legal lending limit or twenty-five
percent (25%) if the additional ten percent (10%) was secured by readily
marketable security.
A loan or group of
loans that are within the legal lending limit of a state bank at the time
the loan or loans are made shall be valid for legal lending limit purposes
until maturity, as stated in the original contract, regardless of
fluctuations in the bank’s legal lending limit; provided, however, that
if a bank’s legal lending limit is reduced due to fluctuations in its
capital base, a loan or group of loans to a borrower or borrowers that
were within the legal lending limit prior to the reduction may become in
violation of the bank’s reduced legal lending limit upon the extension,
renewal or advancement of additional funds on such loan or group of loans
occurring after the reduction in the bank’s legal lending limits.
If
you have any questions regarding this bulletin, please contact Assistant
Commissioner – Bank Division Tod K. Trulove at (615) 741-6013 or Staff
Attorney Tina G. Miller at (615) 532-1030.
Kevin P. Lavender
Commissioner